Matthew Warner
June 24, 2025
Recently, regulatory progress and new guidelines in the Philippines have highlighted the growing adoption and enforcement of the Travel Rule. Formerly on the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) Grey List, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) introduced stringent crypto regulations governing essential compliance measures. This development represents a significant, unified regulatory position from the Philippine, with (Virtual Asset Service Providers) VASPs required to register and obtain a license before operating in the country, underscores a growing trend for such companies globally: robust compliance, particularly with the Travel Rule, is no longer a future consideration but an immediate operational requirement.
For some, the FATF’s Travel Rule has been viewed under the lens of its official title: a ‘recommendation’ - simply a guideline, and one that different jurisdictions would adopt at their own pace. Others realise the importance of implementing the standards it suggests in any jurisdiction serious about progressing and integrating digital assets. The Philippines has picked a side and demonstrated a clear and decisive stance. The framework for crypto token listings is comprehensive, covering everything from token classification (security vs. non-security) to stringent VASP licensing, capital requirements, and cybersecurity.
The requirement for VASPs to implement Travel Rule-compliant transmissions for crypto transfers exceeding US$1,000 means that for any transaction above this amount, the originating VASP must collect and transmit specific originator and beneficiary information to the receiving VASP, and vice versa.
This is not just a suggestion that is being made in the Philippines; the legislation is backed up by severe penalties as the country seeks to avoid fraud and pitfalls that have beset exchanges and investors in the crypto scene previously. Fines for non-compliance are substantial, ranging from significant monetary loss – up to ₱5 million (approximately US$88,000) per violation from the SEC, with additional daily penalties - potential imprisonment, license suspension or revocation by the BSP.
The implications of this development for the broader crypto scene should be clear. The Philippines, as an active and growing market for digital assets, is setting a strong precedent - a concrete example of how FATF recommendations are being translated into national law. It reinforces the idea that the era of operating without comprehensive Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) processes, including the Travel Rule, is rapidly drawing to a close.
For VASPs, this translates into an immediate need to ensure their compliance infrastructure is not only in place but is also highly effective and interoperable, particularly when operating with crypto which has a global reach that crosses jurisdictions. The ability to seamlessly and securely share the required data with counterparty VASPs is now fundamental to maintaining legal operation and mitigating significant financial and reputational risks.
With the Philippines providing regulatory clarity, the indicators that the regulatory landscape for crypto is maturing are strengthening, and the industry must evolve with it. For the long-term health and legitimacy of the crypto sector, such clarity, though sometimes challenging in implementation, is ultimately beneficial. It pushes the industry towards greater transparency and accountability, which are essential for broader institutional and public trust and adoption: a better future for crypto.
Matthew Warner is a content producer and researcher at Blockpass, focusing on writing and community engagement while exploring the potential of blockchain, AI, and IoT technologies.
Explore your options below—whether you're looking to learn more, connect with our team, or start a free trial.